From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-02-29 23:42:01
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 3:39 PM Vinnie Falco <vinnie.falco_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> As I alluded to before the review started, that is grossly unfair...
As usual, the pressing of SEND causes new valuable insights to manifest.
What is important is not Boost.Parser's performance implementing a
stock JSON parser, but rather that it is POSSIBLE for Boost.Parser to
achieve comparable performance given enough work. Thus the question
is, does Boost.Parser offer a sufficiently rich public API to allow
for controlling how things are allocated and which containers are
used, so that the optimizations in Boost.JSON can be replicated.
Thanks