From: Richard (legalize_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-02-28 21:26:51
In article <CALOpkJCSm3-YEfhYVuWZG+XPco09LfOodope37QjOn40qGGQ_Q_at_[hidden]> you write:
>I should have mentioned -- I recently removed the ascii::* parsers,
>which used is_*() from the C standard library. It included
>ascii::alnum. I removed them because those is_*() functions are
>considered just plain wrong by me and lots of other people from SG-16
>(the committee's Unicode study group).
Is there a link to some discussion about why they are considered
'wrong'? Certainly they're correct for ASCII.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals-wiki.org>
The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>