From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-11-29 17:28:27
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 9:37 PM Jeff Garland <azswdude_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> It wasn't a bottleneck for a long time including c++11 -- and it isn't
> again now as LWG has caught up with LEWG largely.
>
My point is that having the bottleneck is a GOOD thing, because it greatly
slows the rate at which C++ can be made worse. WG21 is a failed
institution, the bureaucratic structure is incapable of maintaining the
long-term health of the standard.
Thanks