From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-10-02 14:39:40
Dear Boost,
I have received a non-public review which raises concerns about the
naming land grab by proposed Boost.Async i.e. a Boost library called
"Async" claims too much through its name.
Seeing as nobody here has raised this concern to date, can I confirm
everybody here is fine with proposed Boost.Async being called Boost.Async?
If you are not, please suggest a preferred alternative name.
Niall