From: Ruben Perez (rubenperez038_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-02-08 13:10:47
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 13:11, Vinnie Falco <vinnie.falco_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 3:49 AM Ruben Perez via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > I support the idea of getting rid of json::value for partials
> > and get something more constrained.
>
> I'm glad someone said it. The more time that passes, the less I like
> this tying of Boost.Mustache to Boost.JSON.
Please note that my message was only referring to partials,
which seem to only be a string -> string mapping. I've mentioned
nothing on the actual data passed to be interpolated. I can see
benefits in both Vinnie's and Peter's approaches there.
Regards,
Ruben.