From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2022-08-24 23:42:26
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 2:44 PM Seth via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Even though this is solliciting to become design-by-committee (there
> will never be full consensus) I will go on record that I think the `_ref`/`_cref`
> suffixes are reasonable to me. At least they're relatively short and consistent
> (ref/cref is a closer pair than mutable/const)
I prefer to think of it as "focus group sampling." This is on the table now:
params_view
params_const_view
params_encoded_view
params_encoded_const_view
segments_view
segments_const_view
segments_encoded_view
segments_encoded_const_view
Alan brings up a good point that while these are longer they are more
memorable and it leaves no doubt as to meaning.
Thanks