From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2022-03-24 23:33:05
On 3/24/22 19:11, Alan de Freitas via Boost wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We're deciding on the max size for URLs in our Boost.URL proposal. The spec
> doesn't suggest a limit but the reasonable trade-off
> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/417142/what-is-the-maximum-length-of-a-url-in-different-browsers>
> is:
>
> - 2^16 chars: More than all browsers, servers, and search engines support
> (~2000 chars). More than the HTTP minimum of 8000 octets.
> - 2^32 chars: "414 Too long request" in practice everywhere. Maybe supports
> experiments using URLs as a container for something else.
>
> Any suggestions?
I'd prefer 2^16, especially if it allows to reduce the URI object size
(meaning the object itself, irrespective of the URI string body).
Excessive limits on the URI size may be a source of resource exhaustion
vulnerabilities when the URI is obtained from an external source.