From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2022-02-15 03:30:57
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
> Thank you for spelling it out. Maybe take the boost::exception object as a
> pointer though? That way this (standard for Boost in the future) handler
> can be invoked with exception objects that do not derive from
> boost::exception (even though boost::throw_exception guarantees that they
> do).
Well, the point of the handler is to put things into the boost::exception base,
so if there isn't one... :-)