From: Boris Kolpackov (boris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-11-29 14:54:01
Oliver Kowalke via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I'd like to propose the new library boost.spawn [...]
FWIW (and I may be out of context), but "spawn" seems like a
too generic of a name. I, for example, thought this is about
posix_spawn(). Maybe call it spawn_fiber or some such?