From: Richard Hodges (hodges.r_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-03-24 18:37:46
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 17:57, Peter Dimov via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> The goal here is to make simple lambdas shorter, not to compete with the
> core language lambdas in all cases, which is neither possible nor necessary.
>
> If you just need to say _1 < 0, or _1 < x, or _1 * 2 + 1, the language lambda
> boilerplate takes up more than 50% of the whole thing. If, on the other hand,
> you need to express something more complex than Lambda2 can handle,
> switch to the language lambda.
Thanks for the explanation.
my vote is to ACCEPT
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://listarchives.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost