From: Mike (mike.dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-12-02 14:06:00
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 02. Dezember 2020 um 11:18 Uhr
> Von: "Andrey Semashev via Boost" <boost_at_[hidden]>
>
> On 12/2/20 12:43 AM, Antony Polukhin via Boost wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020, 00:23 Glen Fernandes <glen.fernandes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 4:16 PM Antony Polukhin.
> >>>
> >>> Wich brings me to a less radical idea: we may simplify acceptance of
> >> dependenceless library clones. Next step would be to provide predefined
> >> bcp'ed subsets of libraries (boost 17, boost 23?)
> >>
> >> One option is for that other library (DLL for C++17+) to still live
> >> under the boostorg/dll repository - i.e. it doesn't need to have its
> >> own repository.
> >>
> >
> > You mean folder structure like
> > include/boost/dll/
> > include/boost/dll17/
> >
> > Would the bcp treat dependencies of include/boost/dll17 separately from
> > include/boost/dll?
>
> AFAIR, bcp operates on file level, so yes, it should be able to select
> individual headers used by some root source file, regardless of git
> submodules.
I believe this is true for the header files, but how would bcp know
which subset of source files to include?
Regards
Mike