From: Mike (mike.dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-11-27 12:36:16
> Gesendet: Freitag, 27. November 2020 um 13:26 Uhr
> Von: "Niall Douglas via Boost" <boost_at_[hidden]>
>
> On 27/11/2020 12:19, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:58 AM Antony Polukhin via Boost
> > <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> asio 18 -> 3?
> >> beast 19 -> 4?
> >
> > Beast depends on Asio, so you will have to convince Christopher
> > Kohlhoff to go along with this idea for Asio.
>
> If I were Chris K, I'd respond "If you want to use Boost.ASIO with the
> standard C++ library, please go use Standalone ASIO. Boost.ASIO is
> specifically ASIO targeting Boost".
Whats the problem? Shouldn't that essentially just be a matter of tweaking
boostify.pl to replace fewer std types from the no-boost reference code
with boost equivalents than it currently does? Or is there more to it?
Best
Michael