Re: [review][JSON] json::value as a vocabulary type

From: Rainer Deyke (rdeyke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-09-26 18:44:36

On 25.09.20 17:23, Hadriel Kaplan via Boost wrote:
> Empirical evidence would suggest otherwise. nlohmann, RapidJson, folly::dynamic, etc. do not support that. How can it *need* to support it, when other popular and useful libraries haven’t?

Actually AFAIK nlohmann does support arbitrary numbers, since all 
representation types are template arguments to basic_json.  There's 
nothing to stop you from passing a BigInt type as NumberIntegerType.

-- 
Rainer Deyke (rainerd_at_[hidden])