From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-09-23 14:54:41
Vinnie Falco wrote:
> > 1. The memory management model is extremely simple. I wonder if
> > storage_ptr could be moved somewhere else long term so other libraries
> > can use it.
>
> This is something that has come up a few times, and I think it is worth
> the review manager making a special note of it. For now I am content to
> simply have an initial release of Boost.JSON where the storage_ptr system
> is part of the library (which will be necessary for standalone anyway).
> And we can see how the community feels about it, work out any possible
> kinks.
>
> After some time for the thing to mature, we can measure support for
> proposing it as its own library, or perhaps making it part of another
> library.
How is this going to work in standalone mode?