From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-08-24 17:32:27
On 2020-08-24 20:22, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>
>> - It does *not* require the license to appear in the compiled
>> binaries, which may contain the data in binary form.
>
> It does. Without explicit permission (which the BSL contains for this
> very reason), binaries are derived works as much as script-processed
> files are.
I thought "copies" means copies of the source code, doesn't it? There is
also a latch that the license can appear only in the docs, not the data
itself, whether in source or binary form. I guess, that's what the layer
has to clarify.
But if it indeed means binary form as well then, alas, no Unicode in Boost.