From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-07-07 15:19:06
On 07/07/2020 16:05, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Niall Douglas wrote:
>
>> We discussed whether adding an alternative naming for copy_exception()
>> could be called a major change.
>
> It is both major (API change) and potentially breaking (code that
> already defines its own make_exception_ptr may break).
Do you mean injecting a make_exception_ptr() into the boost namespace?
> "We discussed" carries no weight unless one of the participants in said
> discussion was a release manager.
Our discussion was in good faith. Nothing was meant. If you want it
rolled back, that's also fine.
Niall