From: pbristow_at_[hidden]
Date: 2020-06-18 08:26:43
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost <boost-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of John Maddock via Boost
> Sent: 17 June 2020 18:48
> To: Paul A Bristow via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Cc: John Maddock <jz.maddock_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Random
>
>
> On 17/06/2020 15:53, Paul A Bristow via Boost wrote:
> > I have wanted to use boost::random::random_device; as a seeder for my generator.
> >
> > #include <boost/random/random_device.hpp> // For
> > boost::random::random_device; seeder
> >
> > But using this requires that I link to a library file // LINK : fatal
> > error LNK1104: cannot open file 'libboost_random-vc142-mt-gd-x64-1_73.lib'
> >
> > So I have instead used C++ std random device successfully
> >
> > using std::random_device;
> > random_device seeder;
> > // Use seeder to get a different set of values each time.
> > static boost::random::mt19937 gen(seeder()); // uint32_t
> >
> > But is there any way I can stick to the Boost version (I imagine that it might prove more
portable?
> > Or is this a delusion?)
>
> What do you mean by portable? random_device is inherently non-portable because it's.... random ;)
By portable I mean 'works on as many platforms and C++ standard versions as possible'.
> In many ways this is something that the std:: version does best as the system implementer knows
best
> how to implement on their OS. Or you could just link to Boost.Random of course which would work
> nearly everywhere too I'm sure.
I was just puzzled why Boost.Random needed to *link* when std:random_device doesn't appear to. Is
it quietly linking to a standard library?
Paul
PS Thanks for the even-more-random suggestions but I really, really don't care how randomly random
it is for my application.
So would following the crowd and using time(0) be simplest?