Re: [container] Proposal for ring queues

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-05-22 14:44:04

Mathias Gaunard wrote:

> Nothing prevents you from using a pool allocator with a deque.

And nothing prevents me from using the proposed ring_queue instead. Do you 
have a better point than "you can achieve the same effect in a more 
complicated and stupider way"?