From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-04-28 13:08:58
On 28/04/2020 12:35, Jonathan Wakely via Boost wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 12:30, Andrey Semashev via Boost <
> boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> On 2020-04-28 11:32, Niall Douglas via Boost wrote:
>>> On 28/04/2020 01:08, Glen Fernandes wrote
>>>> Niall, if you want we can provide a Boost.Outcome patch on the 1.73
>>>> release notes (in similar fashion to the Coroutine patch on
>>>> https://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_72_0.html under Known
>>>> Issues) and on https://www.boost.org/patches/ .
>>>
>>> Please find attached a diff against Boost 1.73 which was generated from
>>> bug fix commit
>>>
>> https://github.com/ned14/status-code/commit/9f414ea58264fe0a62172a06f4653adc7556c164
>>
>> You would normally publish patches for the directory structure used in
>> the release tarball. I.e. it should patch
>> boost/outcome/experimental/status-code/status_code_ptr.hpp instead of
>> include/status_code_ptr.hpp.>
> Niall's attachment did match the release tarball directory structure.
> Obviously the git commit didn't, because that isn't the directory structure
> of the git repo.
>
> (I'll make sure that patch gets applied to the Fedora packages).
Correct. It was the *attachment* to my email that contained the diff for
Boost 1.73 release.
Thanks Jonathan for the Fedora package application.
Niall