Boost mailing page: Re: boost [math] excessive warnings via [lexical_cast] from [date

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-03-24 18:17:30

Next message: Jeff Garland: "Re: boost [math] excessive warnings via [lexical_cast] from [date_time] (and others) for clang 3.4?"
Previous message: Mike: "boost [math] excessive warnings via [lexical_cast] from [date_time] (and others) for clang 3.4?"
In reply to: Mike: "boost [math] excessive warnings via [lexical_cast] from [date_time] (and others) for clang 3.4?"
Next in thread: degski: "Re: boost [math] excessive warnings via [lexical_cast] from [date_time] (and others) for clang 3.4?"
Reply: degski: "Re: boost [math] excessive warnings via [lexical_cast] from [date_time] (and others) for clang 3.4?"

Mike wrote:

> As degski mentioned, I doubt clang 3.4 was a particularly popular compiler
> to begin with, so the answer is probably no.

Clang 3.4 was the default Clang on Ubuntu Trusty.

Next message: Jeff Garland: "Re: boost [math] excessive warnings via [lexical_cast] from [date_time] (and others) for clang 3.4?"
Previous message: Mike: "boost [math] excessive warnings via [lexical_cast] from [date_time] (and others) for clang 3.4?"
In reply to: Mike: "boost [math] excessive warnings via [lexical_cast] from [date_time] (and others) for clang 3.4?"
Next in thread: degski: "Re: boost [math] excessive warnings via [lexical_cast] from [date_time] (and others) for clang 3.4?"
Reply: degski: "Re: boost [math] excessive warnings via [lexical_cast] from [date_time] (and others) for clang 3.4?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view