From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-03-22 23:22:23
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 7:18 PM Andrey Semashev wrote:
> The other issue seems to be affecting users as well and I don't have the
> solution for it. Given that the library is unmaintained, it might be
> better to:
>
> 1. Move the current state of develop to a separate branch.
> 2. Revert master and develop to a state prior to Cromwell's commits that
> went into 1.71 (i.e. to the 1.70 state).
>
> This should take care of the Boost.Log issue as well, so it would be
> fine with me as well.
Andrey, I'm in favor of this. If there are no objects, this is what I
think we should do.
Glen