From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-12-04 13:42:11
On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 01:41, Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> Krystian Stasiowski wrote:
>
> > - Empty class specialization for N = 0: Implemented
>
> I don't like this change. A special case for close to zero benefit that
> changes the semantics of data() to not be unique per instance.
>
+1.
Storing the size (as capacity - size) in the last char for N < 256 will
> have
> more impact, but I'm not sure that it too is worth the added complexity.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://listarchives.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
-- @realdegski https://brave.com/google-gdpr-workaround/ "We value your privacy, click here!" Sod off! - degski "Anyone who believes that exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist" - Kenneth E. Boulding "Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell" - Edward P. Abbey