From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-11-30 00:14:33
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 4:06 PM Tim Song via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The extent to which an implementation determines that a type cannot be an
> > input iterator is unspecified, except that as a minimum integral types
> > shall not qualify as input iterators.
Wow, nice bit of archeological work there! Agustin right again, as usual.
Thanks