Subject: Re: [boost] [variant2] Andrzej's review
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-04-13 00:47:02
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 5:35 PM Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The main (and only) reason for rejection is the never-empty basic
> exception-safety guarantee offered and endorsed by the library.
If I want/need a variant that offers the never-empty basic guarantee
then Boost should not provide it?
Thanks