Subject: Re: [boost] boost log to display source code name and lines
From: hh h (jupiter.hce_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-01-11 03:44:32
"The last time I checked out Boost.Log it struck me as overly
complicated for engineering use cases, but that was several years ago.
The documentation at least heavily depended on an anonymous function
EDSL."
I am not familiar with EDSL, did you mean only the documentation
depended on EDSL, not the log design and code, right?
I think that complicity could be the reason driven people away, I
admire it has many good features, but I haven't seen its popularity
comparing to the google log, but I could be wrong.