Subject: Re: [boost] [release] 1.69.0 deadline for new libraries approaching
From: Raffi Enficiaud (raffi.enficiaud_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-23 19:22:59
On 23.10.18 21:02, Stefan Seefeld via Boost wrote:
> On 2018-10-23 02:58 PM, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost wrote:
>
>>
>> I cannot agree more. Also, I consider docbook as a perfect example of
>> extremely complex API, and this is why I am very happy with quickbook.
>>
>> What is your feedback on asciidoc? would you recommend it?
>
> Could we possibly get more off-topic ? The original discussion was about
> supporting *build systems*.
No. "[release] 1.69.0 deadline for new libraries approaching" is the
title of this thread.
I pointed you to cmake scripts that I wrote and that support building
quickbook documentation.
Have you tried those scripts?
What tools you (or anyone else for that
> matter) prefer is entirely irrelevant in that context, precisely because
> a build system needs to support them all.
I remember some people interested in asciidoc, and I believe Rene Rivera
is/was one of them. As "a build system needs to support them all", I am
asking if he would recommend it, to know if this should be supported in
the future.
Is there anything wrong?
R.