Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] Change semantics on UB from peer review agreed semantics?
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-09-14 17:03:08
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:06 AM Alexander Grund via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > And my other question was, are we sure that anyone is using Outcome for
> > this use case. If the answer approaches "no", that is, if nearly all
> users
> > of Outcome use it only to design exception-free interfaces, it might be
> > better to provide this functionality in a different library.
> Isn't that what optional is for? If you don't want value-or-error
> semantics but rather maybe-value semantics, then that's optional<>.
>
No, because optional would just throw std::bad_optional_access, whereas in
this case you still want the exception to indicate what went wrong with the
operation which was attempted.