Subject: Re: [boost] [compressed_pair] [hof] [hana] What's the story with compressed_pair?
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-05-30 17:26:27
Tom Westerhout wrote:
> I would much prefer to use Boost.Utility's one, but unfortunately it's
> neither constexpr-friendly nor noexcept-friendly... Is there some reason
> why it cannot be annotated with macros which expand to constexpr and
> noexcept when compiled with C++11 support? Or has no one just gotten
> around to do it?
I suppose that no one has gotten around to do it. :-)