Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal for a thread synchronisation primitive: future_queue
From: Martin Hierholzer (martin.christoph.hierholzer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-04-26 17:04:38
Dear Viktor,
thank you very much for your feedback!
> I like the idea. Btw, why isn't the has_data() named empty() to conform with stl
> containers?
Good point. I just changed this.
> Also it would be nice to have the member functions documented in the readme
> also. (I might be missing something though).
I have now added a second .md file containing the reference documentation of all member and non-member functions. It is linked in the README.md file.
Cheers,
Martin