Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Performance
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-03-01 20:35:46
Correction: You are asking about Boost.Geometry performance, not Boost
in general
On 1 March 2018 at 21:26, Ian Kosen via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at this benchmark https://github.com/mloskot/spatial_index_benchmark
> which attempts to compare the performance between Boost and LibSpatialIndex.
Correction: Between Boost.Geometry...
> It caught my eye that Boost was magnitudes faster than LibSpatialIndex.
> Is there an obvious reason for this? Design considerations and trade offs?
Suggestions:
1. use [geometry] in the beginnig of subject line, so it is clear what
library is the thread about
2. You may prefer to post your questions to
https://listarchives.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/geometry
Best regards,
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net