Subject: Re: [boost] [CMake] Status of cmake support.
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-25 00:18:25
Mike wrote:
> But I've seen enough resistance (me st of it well reasoned) on the ml
> after the steering committee made their announcement that I wouldn't be
> surprised if a lot of reviews focus on deficiencies / differences compared
> to boost build that are inherent to cmake and not the library itself.
Not good form to foreshadow the reviews in such a manner. You're poisoning
everyone's mind so that every reviewer will be judged, if subconsciously,
against the idea that negative reviews imply bad faith.
We don't do that here.