Subject: Re: [boost] [RFC] unique_val (handles, IDs, descriptors...)
From: Brook Milligan (brook_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-14 22:06:18
> On Feb 14, 2018, at 2:18 PM, Miguel Ojeda via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> If you have the time, please take a look (specially to the Rationale)
> and let me know your comments. The code itself is very short and
> straightforward.
A quick look suggests that this is useful.
However, why not have the unique_val class _be_ the RAII class? Couldn't this be done with extra template arguments (or just one) giving construction/destruction policies? You have perfect forwarding so constructor arguments can be forwarded to the policy. Would this not give you the Foo class for free? Just wondering.
Cheers,
Brook