Subject: Re: [boost] Review Request: impl_ptr (pimpl)
From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-18 13:05:27
On 18 August 2017 at 13:47, Vladimir Batov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> I can be dead wrong but it does not seem (unfortunately) applicable to
> impl_ptr. It appears to be the standard allocator-usage pattern, i.e. I
> explicitly create an allocator (and memory arena) and then take from that
> arena. It's not applicable in the impl_ptr::onstack situation.
>
Aren't you doing something wrong (in your design) then? You called it:
"standard allocator-usage pattern.". Standard is the key word here isn't
it, that's what should be used IMHO.
degski
-- "*Ihre sogenannte Religion wirkt bloß wie ein Opiat reizend, betäubend, Schmerzen aus Schwäche stillend.*" - Novalis 1798