Subject: Re: [boost] Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 1
From: Tom Westerhout (kot.tom97_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-06 22:04:34
On 06/08/2017, Marshall Clow via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:
>
> https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/
>
> The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
>
> 0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3
> boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z
> c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238
> boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2
> 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d
> boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz
> 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f
> boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip
>
> As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the
> candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both
> success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
Sure. I've tried building on Linux 3.16 with GCC-7.1.0 and Clang-trunk:
* Clang-trunk (-std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++)
1) Boost.Test failed. There's no bind1st in std:: anymore. Neither is
there a random_shuffle.
2) Boost.Wave failed due to errors in Spirit. There's no auto_ptr in
std:: anymore.
3) Boost.Locale failed, again because of auto_ptr.
* GCC (-std=c++14)
Everything builds fine.
I would like to complain about the amount of warnings though... Way to
many for my taste.
Tom