Subject: Re: [boost] Boost tests with cmake
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-29 14:30:50
On 7/29/2017 5:02 AM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Louis Dionne wrote:
>
>> If we go Paul's way (which is IMHO the right way in the long term), ...
>
> I've given it some thought and I like the BCM approach; BCM should be a
> library in libs/bcm (if we retain the name).
Perhaps a tool in tools/bcm ?
>
> But I think that Paul's insistence to support the cget workflow, for
> which nobody at the moment cares but him, is making things more
> complicated and error-prone than they could be. (The cget workflow is
> the ability to build and install Boost libraries one by one,
> independently of one another, without a superproject; this requires them
> to refer to one another with find_package.)