Subject: Re: [boost] Switch to CMake -- Analysis
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-21 16:19:03
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Stefan Seefeld via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> You are talking about a use-case involving a Boost *binary* package. How
> is this related to how Boost is built, i.e. how such binaries are
> produced ?
It is not related to building Boost but it solves something that
annoys a non-zero percentage of Boost users who use CMake. Its not
"moving the build system to cmake" but its step forward.