Subject: Re: [boost] Dependency report
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-18 08:33:54
On 07/18/17 03:44, Michel Morin via Boost wrote:
> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>> Strictly speaking, boost::next/prior is not tied to iterators; it is
>> compatible with any type that has the necessary operators (e.g. integers).
>
> Is it possible to deprecate the use of boost::next/prior for non-iterator types?
It is possible, but I'm not sure why we would do that. What is the
problem that we're trying to solve?