Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Build and Microsoft C2 clang
From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-28 15:21:21
On 27 June 2017 at 15:43, Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> kind of works. This cannot be considered a serious toolset though. Why not
> use the LLVM Clang instead?
>
+1
Clang in the front, but VC in the back, it's a transpiler...
degski
-- "*Ihre sogenannte Religion wirkt bloß wie ein Opiat reizend, betäubend, Schmerzen aus Schwäche stillend.*" - Novalis 1798