Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome v2] Please comment on new result<T, EC> reference API docs
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-21 18:11:56
Niall Douglas wrote:
> Dear Boost,
>
> I've been hard at work refactoring Outcome to match the peer review a few
> weeks ago. Much comment at the time mentioned the poor experience of the
> reference API docs, so can I get a community check of this:
>
> https://dedi4.nedprod.com/static/result-v2/doc_result.html
Ideally, one would want only result<> documented, with all its public
members, without the implementation detail result_base<>. Not sure if this
is possible with standardese at the moment.