Subject: Re: [boost] [cmake] Minimum viable cmakeification for Boost
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-21 13:07:13
Thomas Heller wrote:
> For reference, I just had a quick glance at the iostreams (which has a
> dependency on zlib) Jamfile.v2. Two observations from my side:
> 1) It looks very imperative
> 2) The zlib dependency is not handled at the Jamroot but in the
> component directly.
Yes, which is why your idea that Boost.Build is for declarative people and
CMake is for imperative people is wrong. :-)