Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Outcome Review Report
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-06 12:59:10
charleyb123 wrote:
> It is perhaps ironic that the suitability of a proposed library as
> providing vocabulary types and possibly evolving into a future standard
> demands that the Library Author change the library’s stated purpose due to
> this potential popularity;
The demand in this case was to actually _not_ change the library, as it
fulfilled the vocabulary role well in its initial, submitted for review,
design.