Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] outcome without empty state?
From: Gavin Lambert (gavinl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-25 22:52:49
On 26/05/2017 00:30, Peter Dimov wrote:
> Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
>
>> I need a default constructor even if uninitialized.
>> What do you think an uninitialized default constructor?
>
> Awful, of course. Gratuitous undefined behavior is never good.
+1