Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] Ternary logic -- need an example
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-19 20:37:05
Le 18/05/2017 à 16:41, Niall Douglas via Boost a écrit :
>>
>> Also applies to other possible combinations such as expected<expected<T,
>> E1>, E2>, outcome<expected<T, E>>, and so on that can all in principle
>> be flattened into a single variant under the hood.
> Earlier Expected proposals had all sorts of useful semantics for nested
> expected. They have been removed from the most recent proposal.
>
Niall, are you talking of my proposals? If yes, could you recall me what
was there and was removed?
Best,
Vicente