Subject: Re: [boost] [config] What to call macros to indicate deprecated/removed components
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-04-16 11:13:59
On 16 April 2017 at 11:57, John Maddock via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> We could stick with the (easy to implement) existing naming and just use:
>
> BOOST_NO_<FEATURE>
>
> or we could use:
>
> BOOST_<STD>_REMOVED_<FEATURE>
>
> which is a bit more work as all the scripts that rely on the
> BOOST_NO/BOOST_HAS convention need updating.
No strong opinion, but do we want the default to be that they're available?