Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review Request: mp11
From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-25 14:50:38
On 03/18/2017 02:50 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> but that's not much of an improvement. _t is the way to go with mp11.
As _t for <type_traits> is C++14, what is the solution for C++11?