Subject: Re: [boost] Feedback request for Invariant Library idea
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-17 10:07:29
2017-03-17 10:43 GMT+01:00 Attila Szenczi via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>:
> Hello!
>
> I knew about safe_numerics and i felt like it's different from what i want.
> (tho i didn't check the whole lib)
>
> However, i didn't know about constrained_value, and it seems like this lib
> is exactly the same as mine. Even the design decisions are identical... so
> i reinvented the wheel. :'(
>
This proves that the library is useful, and there is a demand for it. Your
energy and motivation could still be used to get the library into Boost. I
can see from the review schedule
<http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html> that this
constrained_value library was even accepted, but then orphaned.
Regards,
&rzej;