Subject: Re: [boost] Synapse library review starts today December 2
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-12-05 21:17:34
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Gavin Lambert <gavinl_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Some use cases would naturally lend itself to one, while others would lend
> itself to the other. If all of the code is controlled by you then using
> Signals2 probably makes more sense, since it's trivial to include the
> signals in your own classes and it gives you better performance (in theory
> -- YMMV with mutexes).
>
This is exactly right, thanks. I'll just add that once you consider Synapse
as part of your arsenal, you'll probably see use cases you're not thinking
about right now. I even ended up rewriting several systems in my own code
base to use Synapse, which made them much simpler and more elegant.
Emil