Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost-users] [process] Formal review results
From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-11-13 07:35:51
On 11/09/2016 07:45 PM, Antony Polukhin wrote:
> The Boost.Process library is accepted.
Unconditionally?
Please notice that some of the votes were conditional, and if those
conditions are not met, they should be counted as no votes.
> The most controversial part of the library is it's interface. Many
> comments were addressing:
> * passing arguments
> * starting process right in `system(...)` function
The comments were about starting the process in the child constructor.