Subject: Re: [boost] Review Manager needed for stacktrace library
From: Nat Goodspeed (nat_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-10-25 15:17:58
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Antony Polukhin <antoshkka_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 2016-10-25 22:00 GMT+03:00 Nat Goodspeed <nat_at_[hidden]>:
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Antony Polukhin <antoshkka_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Is it ok to have a nonmovable type for a stack frame?
>> Could it be move-only?
> So a copy of
> `frame` becomes invalid after the stacktrace destruction.
Maybe a frame should be a weak_ptr<internal_class>, accessed with
pointer semantics?