Subject: Re: [boost] doctest - the lightest feature rich C++ single header testing framework - if it can enter boost and if it/boost will benefit from that
From: Gavin Lambert (gavinl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-23 19:30:06
On 23/05/2016 21:35, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> Why is this called doctest? Are you testing documentation? Or doctors ;)
Presumably it's from the premise that "tests are documentation, so they
should sit next to the production code" (paraphrased).
Which I'm not particularly convinced by, as covered elsewhere.